MyISERN 1.2

Milestone release
User Guide
Developer Guide
Release Notes

This assignment turned out to be very repetitive, and also very difficult on the details. Although we have finished all the tasks, they are not done in a very elegant and efficient way.

The command line interface for inputting data is more complicated than I thought. By complicated, I mean the tons of if and else causes and several infinite loops inside almost every function. The backbone of the program is relatively simple, but that is only based on the assumption of the user do not input error data and knows what to input. A lot of effort has been spent on error checking. However, there are still some minor bugs in the program. We did not notice these bugs until we did the data input at the very end, where we did not know most of the data. If the data is complete and correct, the program will work perfectly fine. However, if the data is incomplete, the program will throw out a bunch of errors due to the schema requirement. Although the errors are all caught by the error checking and indicated, fixing them is such a harsh and tedious job.

What makes this assignment very repetitive and boring is the data input part. It is very often that the information is incomplete, and we will have to end up guessing. Also, because we assigned different data for different group members, such as one person does the researchers and another person does the organization, the program has a serious problem when merge these data together. The different names of organizations and researchers, which are chosen by different group members, give out many invalid links errors, even though they are essentially referring to a same organization or researcher.

This assignment once again showed the importance of face-to-face group work. At the last minute when we tried to figure out the data errors, we were using instant messengers, which was extremely inefficient. Also, a good planning ahead is still not achieved. Although we took our time to scratch out the structure of the program when we met, there are still many changes happened during the actual implementation. The failures to foresee these changes gave us quite a bit of troubles.

In terms of improvement to the system, there are many can be done. First is the Emma testing. We did not cover most of the methods in the editing class, which has many user input inside. Although Professor Johnson said it is not quite possible to do a detailed testing case for it in one week, I still feel unsatisfied for the low coverage of code. On the other hand, a more strict and accurate error checking should be implemented. The current system will still miss some error input.

Overall, this is another lengthy and hard assignment. Well, I think the good thing is I am starting to get used to it.