The code I reviewed is from team blue.
1. Installation
I can download and install the code without any problem. There is a jar command to create a jar file, but I believe that is what is left from the last group since the file is named as "myisern-1-green.jar". All the QA tests are passed except for the Emma, which complains about the missing of the coverage.xml file. I would recommend the team to model their program after the StackStripes, which should easily fix this problem. There is a readme.html file comes with the package, but again, it is something from the last group.
2. Code format and conventions
The code do not violate much rules, however, there are some private variables are not commented in both the model and action bean. Other than this, there is no big problem.
3. Test case
Black box perspective: Only the listing functionality seems to be working correctly. Everything other than that seems incomplete. Adding or editing buttons would cause the program to crush.
White box perspective: Since Emma did not pass and there is currently no JUnit testing written, there is not much white box testing are being done.
Break da buggah: Clicking on the adding or editing button can crush the program.
4. User interface
The interface of website is very straight forward. The screen estate is well preserved since the program is still usable with only half of the monitor size. Although I would prefer some "Back" buttons that allows the users to navigate back to the previous page, as well as a link back to the homepage.
5. Summary and lesson learned
Overall, team blue's code still has a lot of work to be done in order to complete all the core functionalities. Consider this is only a work-in-progress result, it is acceptable. Besides that, the team seems to be on track and working towards the correct way.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment